←── back to feed
/topics/arxiv-ai-papers-october-7

arXiv AI papers October 7

23 items●1 sources●updated 32d ago●trend 0

On October 7, 2026, arXiv released 20 papers spanning AI agent verification, memory management, reasoning optimization, and neurosymbolic systems. The papers address practical challenges in deploying multi-agent systems, including coordination failures, memory misuse, hallucination detection, and auditability frameworks.

  • SPECTRUM introduces looped self-distillation for code generation, showing correctness can improve while solution diversity contracts
  • MemMux and NP-Bench tackle resource attribution and coordination verification for parallel coding agents on shared workstations
  • Trust Layer framework post-hoc verifies agent benchmark scores across four properties: grading logic, traceable computation, completion claims, and reproducibility
  • Trajectory-Local Adaptive Retrieval (TLAR) retrieves matched continuations from model history to accelerate chain-of-thought reasoning with adaptive verification
  • Survey of 50+ neurosymbolic systems maps Datalog, answer set, and probabilistic logic programs across databases, ML, vision, and robotics applications
  • Defense-in-depth framework separates internal activation steering from external memory handling to mitigate memory-induced sycophancy in long-term LLM agents
[BLG]blog/rss23
SPECTRUM: Proximal Spectral Modulation for Looped Self-Distillation
arXiv cs.AI · Yunbo Long, WenJie Chen, Jiaquan Zhang, Guangya Hao, Zihang Zeng, Pengze Li, Xi Chen · 32d
Can Semantic Geometry Teach an AI Judgement?
arXiv cs.AI · Thomson D. Nguy (Radiant Institute for Manifold Studies) · 32d
Internalizing Agent Experience into Diffusion Model Weights via On-Policy Context Distillation
arXiv cs.AI · Wenxuan Wang, Zekai Liu, Weinan Zhang, Yu Cheng, Yang Yang · 32d
MemMux: Runtime Verification and Honest Resource Attribution for Fleets of Parallel Coding Agents
arXiv cs.AI · Sumanyu Muku · 32d
Verifying Coordination in Parallel Coding Agents: NP-Bench and a Scheduling Planner
arXiv cs.AI · Sumanyu Muku · 32d
Does the Model Use the Feature? Separating Steering from Mechanism in LLMs
arXiv cs.AI · Tong Che, Yilong Li · 32d
A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation
arXiv cs.AI · Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri, Abhishek Mukherji · 32d
The Right Memory in the Wrong Context: Verifying Retrieval Admissibility in Long-Term Agent Memory
arXiv cs.AI · Zi Wang, Xingqiao Wang, Emmanuel Addai, Devika Ambekar, Xiaowei Xu · 32d
Understanding and Mitigating Inference-Time Overreliance Using Agentic Memory
arXiv cs.AI · Luoxi Tang, Yuqiao Meng, Nilesh Auradkar, Muchao Ye, Dazheng Zhang, Zhaohan Xi · 32d
Rule-Based Languages for Neurosymbolic AI
arXiv cs.AI · Stefania Dumbrava, Efthymia Tsamoura · 32d
Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization: Learning to Reason with Adaptive Rationale Scaffolding
arXiv cs.AI · Hoang Phan, Minh Pham, Chau Pham, Chinmay Hegde, Trung Le, Qi Lei · 32d
Trajectory-Retrieval Speculative Decoding: When Does a Model's Own History Help?
arXiv cs.AI · Yuyang Dai, Yushun Dong · 32d
Evaluating Escalation Signals for LLM Routing: Targets, Controls, and Five Ways to Fool Yourself
arXiv cs.AI · Ramin Pishehvar, Andrea Morandi, Mahesh Viswanathan · 32d
Evaluate the Stack, Not the Layer: Do Deterministic and LLM Gates for Agent Actions Fail Independently?
arXiv cs.AI · Chenglin Yang · 32d
MemCo: Memory-Centric Collaboration for Generalizing LLM Agents to Unseen Environments
arXiv cs.AI · Xinting Liao, Siyan Liu, Rabab K. Ward, Holger R. Roth, Xiaoxiao Li · 32d
Defense-in-Depth for LLMs: Evaluating Memory Gates Against Activation-Induced and Memory-Induced Sycophancy
arXiv cs.AI · Ritvij Sharma, Russell Dlugosz, Ryan Zhou, Maheep Chaudhary · 32d
2d-fet-bench: from spatial reasoning to fet design on flakes
arXiv cs.AI · Dunzhi Zhou, Chengyu Zhu, Gang Qiu, Caiwen Ding · 32d
Adaptive Gait Biofeedback With Participant-Held-Out Modeling and Participant-Specific Updating in Chronic Ankle Instability
arXiv cs.AI · Jaeyoon (Jason), Kim, Veronika Lebisova, Jeniya Sultana, Jaeyoung Cho, Jaeho Jang · 32d
When Does AI Supervision Help? A Role-Aware Study of Network Fraud Decision Management with Blockchain Auditability
arXiv cs.AI · Saviz Changizi, Nasibeh Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Shojafar, Rahim Tafazolli · 32d
Auditable Claims about AI Agents
arXiv cs.AI · Yue Zhao, Jiate Li, Li Li, Yi Nian, Jinbo Liu, Xiaolin Zhou, Xiyang Hu · 32d
COMPASS: Finding Where Reasoning Lives in Language Models
arXiv cs.AI · Pratyay Dutta, Kowshik Thopalli, Vivek Narayanaswamy · 32d
PsyCIDRA: A Dual-Agent Framework for Psychiatric Interviewing and Diagnostic Reasoning
arXiv cs.AI · Milad Mohammadi, Fatemeh Akrami Shamsabadi, Zahra Mohseni, Amirhossein Safdarian, Malekfarhad Malek, Hadi Moradi, Hesham Faili · 32d
In With the Old: Enhancing 'Classical' Document Automation with Generative AI
arXiv cs.AI · Marc Lauritsen, Hannes Westermann · 32d